Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Fine-tuning ChatGPT for automatic scoring

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Fine-tuning ChatGPT for automatic scoring

Ehsan Latif
Xiaoming Zhai
2024
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
6
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
evaluación
ChatGPT
grandes modelos de lenguaje
herramientas
tecnología educativa
IA y evaluación
modelos de lenguaje (LLM)
chatGPT
estudio empírico

Texto completo

This study highlights the potential of fine-tuned ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) for automatically scoring student written constructed responses using example assessment tasks in science education. The application of ChatGPT in research and academic fields has greatly enhanced productivity and efficiency. Recent studies on ChatGPT based on OpenAI's generative model GPT-3.5 proved its superiority in predicting the natural language with high accuracy and human-like responses. GPT-3.5 has been trained over enormous online language materials such as journals and Wikipedia; however, direct usage of pre-trained GPT-3.5 is insufficient for automatic scoring as students do not utilize the same language as journals or Wikipedia, and contextual information is required for accurate scoring. All of these imply that a fine-tuning of a domain-specific model using data for specific tasks can enhance model performance. In this study, we fine-tuned GPT-3.5 on six assessment tasks with a diverse dataset of middle-school and high-school student responses and expert scoring. The six tasks comprise two multi-label and four multi-class assessment tasks. We compare the performance of fine-tuned GPT-3.5 with the fine-tuned state-of-the-art Google's generated language model, BERT. The results show that in-domain training corpora constructed from science questions and responses for BERT achieved average accuracy = 0.838, SD = 0.069. GPT-3.5 shows a remarkable average increase (9.1%) in automatic scoring accuracy (mean = 9.15, SD = 0.042) for the six tasks, p =0.001 < 0.05. Specifically, for each of the two multi-label tasks (item 1 with 5 labels; item 2 with 10 labels), GPT-3.5 achieved significantly higher scoring accuracy than BERT across all the labels, with the second item achieving a 7.1% increase. The average scoring increase for the four multi-class items for GPT-3.5 was 10.6% compared to BERT. Our study confirmed the effectiveness of fine-tuned GPT-3.5 for automatic scoring of student responses on domain-specific data in education with high accuracy. We have released fine-tuned models for public use and community engagement.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Applying large language models and chain-of-thought for automatic scoring
  • Assessing the proficiency of large language models in automatic feedback generation: An evaluation study
  • Effects of adaptive feedback generated by a large language model: A case study in teacher education
  • Investigating the affordances of OpenAI's large language model in developing listening assessments
  • How do LLMs perform in the context of MCQs across different levels of thinking skills in a business education course at higher education? A comparison of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot
  • Can AI provide useful holistic essay scoring?
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos