Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • A systematic review of conversational AI tools in ELT: Publication trends, tools, research methods, learning outcomes, and antecedents

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

A systematic review of conversational AI tools in ELT: Publication trends, tools, research methods, learning outcomes, and antecedents

Wan Yee Winsy Lai
Ju Seong Lee
2024
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
7
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
revisión bibliográfica
inteligencia artificial
chatbots
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas
CALL/ELAO
IA y enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas
chatbots
revisión de bibliografía

Texto completo

This review analyzed the trends in conversational AI tools in ELT from January 2013 to November 2023. The study examined 32 papers, focusing on publication trends, tool types, research methods, learning outcomes, and factors influencing their use. Findings revealed a gradual increase in publications, with 4 (12%) from 2013 to 2021, 13 (41%) in 2022, and 15 (47%) in 2023. All studies (100%) were conducted in Asian EFL contexts. Among the AI chatbots, Google Assistant (25%) was the most widely used. Quasi-experimental (45%) and cross-section (41%) research designs were commonly employed. Mixed-method (50%) approaches were prevalent for data collection and analysis. Conversational AI yielded positive outcomes in affective (43%) and cognitive skills (41%). The main factors influencing user perceptions or behaviors were individual (47%) and microsystem layers (31%). Future studies should (a) include diverse contexts beyond Asia, (b) consider the use of up-to-date tools (e.g., ChatGPT), (c) employ rigorous experimental designs, (d) explore behavioral learning outcomes, and (e) investigate broader environmental factors. The systematic review enhances current knowledge of recent research trends, identifies environmental factors influencing conversational AI tools concentrating in ELT, and provides insights for future research and practice in this rapidly evolving field.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university
  • Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning
  • GenAI chatbots in language learning: A systematic review of emerging affordances
  • AI-driven chatbots in second language education: A systematic review of their efficacy and pedagogical implications
  • Chatbots as a Field of Inquiry in CALL
  • A systematic review on cross-culture, humor and empathy dimensions in conversational chatbots: the case of second language acquisition
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos