Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • ๐Ÿ“‹ Actividades
    • ๐Ÿ“ Conjugación
    • ๐Ÿ“Š Corpus
    • ๐Ÿ“” Diccionarios
    • โœ… Evaluación
    • โš™๏ธ Gramática
    • ๐Ÿ“— Manuales
    • โœ๏ธ Ortografía
    • ๐Ÿ“… Programación
    • ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Pronunciación
    • ๐Ÿ“ Recursos
    • ๐Ÿ”ค Vocabulario
    • ๐Ÿ’ป Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • ๐Ÿ“š Bibliografía
    • ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Congresos
    • ๐ŸŽ“ Cursos
    • ๐Ÿซ Centros
    • ๐Ÿข Organizaciones
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Revistas
    • ๐ŸŒ Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ Ofertas de trabajo
    • โ„น๏ธ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • ๐ŸŒ Sitios ELE
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Agregador
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Formespa
  • IA
    • โœจ Nuevos contenidos
    • ๐Ÿ“š Bibliografía IA
    • ๐Ÿงฐ Herramientas IA
    • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Prompts
    • ๐Ÿงช Experiencias IA
    • ๐ŸŒ Sitios web IA
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Actualidad ELE
    • ๐Ÿ˜Š Anécdotas ELE
    • ๐Ÿ“ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Teachers’ generative AI self-efficacy, valuing, and integration at work: Examining job resources and demands

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Teachers’ generative AI self-efficacy, valuing, and integration at work: Examining job resources and demands

Rebecca J. Collie
Andrew J. Martin
Dragan Gaševiฤ‡
2024
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
7
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
encuesta
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
profesorado
creencias y actitudes de los profesores
motivación
educación primaria y secundaria
factores afectivos
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

Generative AI (genAI) tools have involved rapid and broad uptake since their wide release in late 2022, including among teachers. We investigated several factors that play a role in teachers’ motivation and engagement to harness genAI in teaching and learning. We examined contextual factors (in-school support to apply genAI, time pressure, disruptive student behavior) as predictors of motivation (genAI self-efficacy and genAI valuing) and, in turn, engagement (i.e., genAI integration in teaching-related work and student learning activities) over the course of one school term. Among 368 Australian primary and secondary school teachers, our findings revealed that genAI support was associated with greater genAI self-efficacy and genAI valuing. Time pressure was also linked with greater genAI valuing, whereas disruptive student behavior was not linked with the genAI motivation or engagement variables. In turn, genAI self-efficacy was linked with greater levels of both types of genAI integration. GenAI valuing was associated with greater genAI integration in teaching-related work only. Our results provide knowledge about factors relevant for supporting genAI and its application among teachers in Australia—and also hold relevance to teachers in other countries.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Teachers’ motivation and engagement to harness generative AI for teaching and learning: The role of contextual, occupational, and background factors
  • Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers' perspective
  • Navigating the future: Exploring in-service teachers' preparedness for artificial intelligence integration into South African schools
  • Leading digital transformation and eliminating barriers for teachers to incorporate artificial intelligence in basic education in Hong Kong
  • Attitudes, perceptions and AI self-efficacy in K-12 education
  • Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos