Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing

Johan van Niekerk
Petrus M.J. Delport
Iain Sutherland
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
8
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
escritura académica
ChatGPT
integridad académica
educación superior
creencias y actitudes de los estudiantes
expresión escrita
herramientas
tecnología educativa
IA y enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas
chatGPT
análisis de producción de IA
estudio empírico

Texto completo

The rise of generative AI has been a major disruptive force in academia. Academics are concerned about its impact on student learning. Students can use generative AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, to complete many academic tasks on their behalf. This could lead to poor academic outcomes as students use ChatGPT to complete assessments, rather than engaging with the learning material. One particularly vulnerable academic activity is academic writing. This paper reports the results of an active learning intervention where ChatGPT was used by students to write an academic paper. The resultant papers were then analysed and critiqued by students to highlight the weaknesses of such AI-produced papers. The research used the Technology Acceptance Model to measure changing student perceptions about the usefulness and ease of use of ChatGPT in the creation of academic text. A statistical analysis indicates the intervention's impact on their behavioural intentions on using ChatGPT for academic writing.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Style, sentiment, and quality of undergraduate writing in the AI era: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 4,820 authentic empirical reports
  • Exploring EAP students' perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning
  • Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners' experiences and perceptions
  • Do teachers spot AI? Evaluating the detectability of AI-generated texts among student essays
  • Students’ use of large language models in engineering education: A case study on technology acceptance, perceptions, efficacy, and detection chances
  • AI-assisted writing and the impact of ChatGPT on Greek-speaking students with and without learning disabilities. Outcomes from a repeated measures design
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos