Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Artificial intelligence ethical awareness of university students in Ghana: A network and latent profile analyses

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Artificial intelligence ethical awareness of university students in Ghana: A network and latent profile analyses

Bernard Yaw Sekyi Acquah
Iddrisu Salifu
Francis Arthur
Mark Inkoom
Sheriff Dangimah Suradji
Christian Inkoom
Emmanuel Quayson
Silas Afutu Quaye
Francis Obeng Gyedu
Sharon Abam Nortey
2026
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
11
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
encuesta
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
ética
educación superior
alfabetización en IA
ética de la IA
estudio empírico

Texto completo

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly integrated into students’ academic lives in Ghana, making it crucial to examine their perspectives on ethical dimensions. Against this backdrop, this study assesses the artificial intelligence ethical awareness (AIEA) among 509 Ghanaian university students across the dimensions of human autonomy, beneficence, and fairness, based on AIEA scale originally developed and validated in Hong Kong. The confirmatory factor analysis supported the scale’s three-factor structure within this setting. The network analysis also demonstrated meaningful interconnection among the dimensions, with select items serving as conceptual links, most prominently tying concerns over human agency to perceptions of beneficence. The latent profile analysis further distinguished five student subgroups, spanning those exhibiting uniformly very high awareness to a small but notable cluster displaying no ethical awareness, particularly regarding beneficence. In addition, MANOVA results confirmed that gender contributed no statistically meaningful variation. Together, the evidence characterises AI ethical awareness as a coherent yet unevenly distributed construct, highlighting priorities for shaping future AI ethics curricula in Ghana.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Enhancing AI literacy course satisfaction through empowerment in AI problem-solving and ethical awareness: Development and validation of an AI project-based learning scale
  • Response-length confounding in participant–morpheme networks: A length-controlled test in AI ethics education
  • AI ethics as a complex and multifaceted challenge: Decoding educators’ AI ethics alignment through the lens of activity theory
  • Preparing pre-service teachers for responsible generative AI use: Curriculum implications for ethics, privacy, and AI literacy
  • Empowering learners for the age of artificial intelligence
  • Manifesto for Generative AI in Higher Education – The Book Project: A living reflection on teaching, learning, and technology in an age of abundance
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos