Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • ๐Ÿ“‹ Actividades
    • ๐Ÿ“ Conjugación
    • ๐Ÿ“Š Corpus
    • ๐Ÿ“” Diccionarios
    • โœ… Evaluación
    • โš™๏ธ Gramática
    • ๐Ÿ“— Manuales
    • โœ๏ธ Ortografía
    • ๐Ÿ“… Programación
    • ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Pronunciación
    • ๐Ÿ“ Recursos
    • ๐Ÿ”ค Vocabulario
    • ๐Ÿ’ป Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • ๐Ÿ“š Bibliografía
    • ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Congresos
    • ๐ŸŽ“ Cursos
    • ๐Ÿซ Centros
    • ๐Ÿข Organizaciones
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Revistas
    • ๐ŸŒ Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ Ofertas de trabajo
    • โ„น๏ธ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • ๐ŸŒ Sitios ELE
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Agregador
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Formespa
  • IA
    • โœจ Nuevos contenidos
    • ๐Ÿ“š Bibliografía IA
    • ๐Ÿงฐ Herramientas IA
    • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Prompts
    • ๐Ÿงช Experiencias IA
    • ๐ŸŒ Sitios web IA
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Actualidad ELE
    • ๐Ÿ˜Š Anécdotas ELE
    • ๐Ÿ“ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy

Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
Nir Kshetri
Laurie Hughes
Emma Louise Slade
Anand Jeyaraj
Arpan Kumar Kar
Abdullah Mohammed Baabdullah
Alex A. Koohang
Vishnupriya Raghavan
Manju K. Ahuja
Hanaa Albanna
Mousa Ahmad Albashrawi
Adil S. Al-Busaidi
Janarthanan Balakrishnan
Yves Barlette
Sriparna Basu
Indranil Bose
Laurence Brooks
Dimitrios Buhalis
Lemuria D. Carter
Soumyadeb Chowdhury
Tom Crick
Scott W. Cunningham
Gareth H. Davies
Robert M. Davison
Rahul Dé
Denis Dennehy
Yanqing Duan
Rameshwar Dubey
Rohita Dwivedi
John Steven Edwards
Carlos Flavián
Robin D. C. Gauld
Varun Grover
Mei-Chih Hu
Marijn Janssen
Paul Jones
Iris A. Junglas
Sangeeta Khorana
Sascha Kraus
Kai R. T. Larsen
Paul Latreille
Sven Laumer
Tegwen Malik
Abbas Mardani
Marcello Mariani
Sunil Mithas
Emmanuel Mogaji
Jeretta Horn Nord
Siobhan M. O'Connor
Fevzi OkumuลŸ
Margherita Pagani
Neeraj Pandey
Savvas Papagiannidis
Ilias O. Pappas
Nishith Pathak
Jan Pries-Heje
Ramakrishnan Raman
Nripendra Pratap Rana
Sven-Volker Rehm
Samuel Ribeiro Navarrete
Alexander Richter
Frantz Rowe
Suprateek Sarker
Bernd Carsten Stahl
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Wil. M. P. van der Aalst
Viswanath Venkatesh
Giampaolo Viglia
Michael R. Wade
Paul Walton
Jochen Wirtz
Ryan T. Wright
2023
International Journal of Information Management
71
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.202…
artículo
trabajo teórico
inteligencia artificial
ChatGPT
ética
metodología de investigación
herramientas
tecnología educativa
chatGPT
ética de la IA
IA y educación

Texto completo

Transformative artificially intelligent tools, such as ChatGPT, designed to generate sophisticated text indistinguishable from that produced by a human, are applicable across a wide range of contexts. The technology presents opportunities as well as, often ethical and legal, challenges, and has the potential for both positive and negative impacts for organisations, society, and individuals. Offering multi-disciplinary insight into some of these, this article brings together 43 contributions from experts in fields such as computer science, marketing, information systems, education, policy, hospitality and tourism, management, publishing, and nursing. The contributors acknowledge ChatGPT’s capabilities to enhance productivity and suggest that it is likely to offer significant gains in the banking, hospitality and tourism, and information technology industries, and enhance business activities, such as management and marketing. Nevertheless, they also consider its limitations, disruptions to practices, threats to privacy and security, and consequences of biases, misuse, and misinformation. However, opinion is split on whether ChatGPT’s use should be restricted or legislated. Drawing on these contributions, the article identifies questions requiring further research across three thematic areas: knowledge, transparency, and ethics; digital transformation of organisations and societies; and teaching, learning, and scholarly research. The avenues for further research include: identifying skills, resources, and capabilities needed to handle generative AI; examining biases of generative AI attributable to training datasets and processes; exploring business and societal contexts best suited for generative AI implementation; determining optimal combinations of human and generative AI for various tasks; identifying ways to assess accuracy of text produced by generative AI; and uncovering the ethical and legal issues in using generative AI across different contexts.

Artículo 102642. Reúne 43 contribuciones de especialistas de distintas disciplinas, una de ellas sobre enseñanza y aprendizaje. Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning
  • ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?
  • ChatGPT e inteligencia artificial en la educación superior: guía de inicio rápido
  • TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and Generative AI
  • Using AI to Implement Effective Teaching Strategies in Classrooms: Five Strategies, Including Prompts
  • La inteligencia artificial generativa: una innovación transformadora en la enseñanza de lenguas
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos