Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Generative AI in high school English career preparation units: Student interactions, perceptions, and ethical concerns

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Generative AI in high school English career preparation units: Student interactions, perceptions, and ethical concerns

Kyungbin Kwon
Sohheon Yang
Ugur Kale
Keunjae Kim
Juhyun Park
2026
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
10
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
estudio de caso
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
expresión escrita
educación primaria y secundaria
creencias y actitudes de los estudiantes
ética
IA y enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas
IA y aprendizaje
ética de la IA
estudio empírico

Texto completo

The rapid integration of generative AI into K–12 education presents both opportunities and challenges for supporting students’ learning. This mixed-methods case study examined how high school students interacted with an AI-enhanced resume writing unit and a text-based mock interview unit within an English Language Arts course. Quantitative results indicated students’ positive perceptions of AI utility across constructs of awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics. Qualitative analysis revealed that students used AI to explore career information, generate and refine resume content, and iteratively revise and refine interview responses. While many students engaged critically—questioning, personalizing, and revising AI suggestions—others adopted a more passive or overly dependent approach. Students reported feeling more confident and valued individualized feedback, yet they also identified challenges such as AI’s generic or decontextualized responses, difficulties interpreting AI feedback, and ethical concerns regarding authenticity, plagiarism, and overreliance. This study argues that meaningful integration of generative AI in secondary classrooms requires explicit instruction in prompting, verification, and critical evaluation so that students develop both the agency and the skills necessary to use AI as a scaffold rather than a substitute for learning.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • A Q method study on Turkish EFL learners’ perspectives on the use of AI tools for writing: Benefits, concerns, and ethics
  • Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora's box
  • Exploring the use of GenAI in model texts as a feedback instrument: L2 students’ practice and perceptions
  • Lower secondary students’ poetry writing with the AI-based Poetry Machine
  • Unmasking the impacts of self-evaluation in AI-supported writing instruction on EFL learners’ emotion regulation, self-competence, motivation, and writing achievement
  • Navigating AI writing tools in medical education: A SWOT analysis of L2 academic writing perspectives
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos