Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Developing EFL students’ pragmatic competence: The case of compliment responses

Developing EFL students’ pragmatic competence: The case of compliment responses

Zainab Alsuhaibani
2022
Language Teaching Research
26-5
847-866
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
estudio experimental
encuesta
estudio empírico
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas
pragmática
actos de habla
corpus
reflexión metalingüística

This study investigated the effect of consciousness-raising instruction and corpus-based instruction on EFL (English as a foreign language) students’ development of compliment responses. It employed a quasi-experimental design with 136 EFL university students divided between three groups: control, consciousness-raising, and corpus groups. A discourse completion test (DCT) was used as a pre- and post-test with all the groups to investigate any significant differences between them. Further, a questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to explore students’ perceptions of pragmatic instruction of compliment responses. The results showed the effectiveness of pragmatic instruction of compliment responses through both consciousness-raising instruction and corpus- based instruction. More specifically, significant differences were found between consciousness-raising group and the corpus group on one hand, and the control group on the other. No significant differences were found between the consciousness-raising group and the corpus group. The results also revealed that the students value the importance of pragmatic instruction indicating that it was important, necessary, useful, and enjoyable at the same time. The article ends with some pedagogical recommendations for pragmatic instruction.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • New Ways to Teach and Learn Pragmatics for Advancing Academic Communication Competence: An AI-Mediated Multimodal Platform
  • Direct and indirect data-driven learning: An experimental study of hedging in an EFL writing class
  • Exploring the role of strategy instruction on learners’ ability to write authentic email requests to faculty
  • Explicit and implicit instruction of refusal strategies: Does working memory capacity play a role?
  • Pedagogic tasks in digital games: Effects of feedback conditions and individual characteristics on learning request-making
  • ‘May I do something for you?’: The effects of audio-visual material (captioned and non-captioned) on EFL pragmatic learning
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos