Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Understanding the practices, perceptions, and (dis)trust of generative AI among instructors: A mixed-methods study in the U.S. higher education

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Understanding the practices, perceptions, and (dis)trust of generative AI among instructors: A mixed-methods study in the U.S. higher education

Wenhan Lyu
Shuang Zhang
Tingting Chung
Yifan Sun
Yixuan Zhang
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
8
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
encuesta
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
creencias y actitudes de los profesores
profesorado
educación superior
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

Generative AI (GenAI) has brought opportunities and challenges for higher education as it integrates into teaching and learning environments. As instructors navigate this new landscape, understanding their engagement with and attitudes toward GenAI is crucial. We surveyed 178 instructors from a single U.S. university to examine their current practices, perceptions, trust, and distrust of GenAI in higher education in March 2024. While most surveyed instructors reported moderate to high familiarity with GenAI-related concepts, their actual use of GenAI tools for direct instructional tasks remained limited. Our quantitative results show that trust and distrust in GenAI are related yet distinct; high trust does not necessarily imply low distrust, and vice versa. We also found significant differences in surveyed instructors' familiarity with GenAI across different trust and distrust groups. Our qualitative results show nuanced manifestations of trust and distrust among surveyed instructors and various approaches to support calibrated trust in GenAI. We discuss practical implications focused on (dis)trust calibration among instructors.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives
  • GenAI as a runaway object in higher education: A socio-cultural view on AI-influenced academic practice in mathematics
  • The AI challenge: How college faculty assess the present and future of higher education in the age of AI
  • College faculty perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education
  • Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers' perspective
  • Pre-service teachers' perceptions and intentions regarding the use of chatbots through statistical and lag sequential analysis
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos