Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • AI ethics as a complex and multifaceted challenge: Decoding educators’ AI ethics alignment through the lens of activity theory

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

AI ethics as a complex and multifaceted challenge: Decoding educators’ AI ethics alignment through the lens of activity theory

Jaber Kamali
Muhammet Furkan Alpat
Aras Bozkurt
2024
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
21
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-0049…
artículo
entrevistas
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
ética
creencias y actitudes de los profesores
educación superior
formación de profesores
ética de la IA
estudio empírico

Texto completo

This study explores university educators’ perspectives on their alignment with artificial intelligence (AI) ethics, considering activity theory (AT), which forms the theoretical underpinning of this study. To do so, 37 educators from a higher education institution were selected to write their metaphors about AI ethics alignment, out of which 11 attended semi-structured interviews, in which they answered some questions about their AI ethics alignment and narrated some experiences. The study reveals diverse and often contradictory perspectives on AI ethics, highlighting a general lack of awareness and inconsistent application of ethical principles. Some educators metaphorised AI ethics as fundamental but difficult to understand, while others pointed to the difficulties of regulating ethical violations. The findings highlight the need for targeted professional development on AI ethics, collaborative policy making and a multidisciplinary approach to promote ethical use of AI in higher education. This study also calls for stronger alignment between educators’ personal ethical standards and institutional norms to reduce AI-related risks in educational settings.

Artículo 62. Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Fixing teachers’ problems? Exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies
  • The AI challenge: How college faculty assess the present and future of higher education in the age of AI
  • College faculty perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education
  • A worldwide study on language educators’ initial response to ChatGPT
  • Criteria related to the pedagogical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in university teaching
  • University teachers' perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education - An experimental philosophical study
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos