Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The AI Crisis in Higher Education: A Strategic Proposal

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

The AI Crisis in Higher Education: A Strategic Proposal

Mark Carrigan
2026
University of Manchester
Manchester
63
https://manchester.pressbooks.pub/the-a…
libro
trabajo teórico
inteligencia artificial
educación superior
evaluación
integridad académica
tecnología educativa
IA y educación
IA y evaluación

Texto completo

What is to be done? It is a question every university has asked about ‘artificial intelligence’ since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. Language models are now a routine part of how staff and students work, yet there is no agreement about what constitutes appropriate and inappropriate use. They have become ubiquitous without being normalised.

In this short book, Mark Carrigan argues that the result is a multidimensional crisis of trust, in which staff and students increasingly suspect one another of using models in problematic ways. Universities face a dilemma: they must adapt to AI to protect the value of their degrees, and integrate AI to preserve the relevance of what they teach, yet each agenda tends to undercut the other. Meanwhile the economics of the AI industry are profoundly unstable, and the terms on which these models are offered are likely to change dramatically once the investment bubble bursts or the major labs go public.

Rather than another ‘AI strategy’, Carrigan proposes strategic under-integration: securing assessment where it matters, integrating models cautiously and without lock-in, and building the relational capacity universities need to cope with ongoing technological change. The window of visibility is still open, but it will not stay open for long.

Índice
  • 1. What’s the Situation?
  • 2. What’s the Crisis?
  • 3. Why Not Integrate Now?
  • 4. What Can We Do?
  • References

Publicado el 23 de septiembre de 2026 en Pressbooks. Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), en PDF y EPUB.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Generative AI and education: Digital pedagogies, teaching innovation and learning design
  • Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
  • The opposite of cheating: Teaching for integrity in the age of AI
  • Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback: Student perceptions of usefulness and trustworthiness
  • OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education
  • Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT: Rethinking exam design, assessment strategies, and ethical AI policies in higher education
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos