Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment

Leon Furze
Mike Perkins
Jasper Roe
Jason Alexander MacVaugh
2024
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
40-4
38-55
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9434
artículo
estudio de caso
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
evaluación
integridad académica
educación superior
innovación educativa
IA y evaluación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies in higher education has raised concerns about academic integrity, assessment practices and student learning. Banning or blocking GenAI tools has proven ineffective, and punitive approaches ignore the potential benefits of these technologies. As a result, assessment reform has become a pressing topic in the GenAI era. This paper presents the findings of a pilot study conducted at British University Vietnam exploring the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS), a flexible framework for incorporating GenAI into educational assessments. The AIAS consists of five levels, ranging from “no AI” to “full AI,” enabling educators to design assessments that focus on areas requiring human input and critical thinking. The pilot study results indicate a significant reduction in academic misconduct cases related to GenAI and enhanced student engagement with GenAI technology. The AIAS facilitated a shift in pedagogical practices, with faculty members incorporating GenAI tools into their modules and students producing innovative multimodal submissions. The findings suggest that the AIAS can support the effective integration of GenAI in higher education, promoting academic integrity while leveraging technology’s potential to enhance learning experiences. Implications for practice or policy: Higher education institutions should adopt flexible frameworks like the AIAS to guide ethical integration of GenAI into assessment practices. Educators should design assessments that leverage GenAI capabilities, while supporting critical thinking and human input. Institutional policies related to GenAI should be developed in consultation with stakeholders and regularly updated to keep pace with technological advancements. Policymakers should prioritise research funding into the impacts of GenAI on higher education to inform evidence-based practices.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). La escala se actualizó en 2025: ver Reimagining the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale, de Perkins, Roe y Furze.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • GenAI detection tools, adversarial techniques and implications for inclusivity in higher education
  • Reimagining the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale: A refined framework for educational assessment
  • GPT-3.5 para la nivelación de ELE en un entorno universitario: Un estudio comparativo de zero-shot learning y fine-tuning
  • Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback: Student perceptions of usefulness and trustworthiness
  • How adding metacognitive requirements in support of AI feedback in practice exams transforms student learning behaviors
  • GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos