Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • AI literacy development in middle school: Profiles and demographic predictors from an ABCE perspective

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

AI literacy development in middle school: Profiles and demographic predictors from an ABCE perspective

Zheng Liang Sun
Yau Yu Chan
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
9
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
encuesta
validación de instrumentos
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
alfabetización en IA
educación primaria y secundaria
diferencias individuales
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

This study examines artificial intelligence (AI) literacy among middle school students through the lens of the ABCE framework, which encompasses Affective, Behavioral, Cognitive, and Ethical dimensions. Using a sample of 1669 students from Shanghai, China, the research validates the AI Literacy Questionnaire (AILQ) as a robust psychometric tool for assessing these four domains. Latent profile analysis identified four distinct AI literacy profiles, Poor, Moderate, Good, and Excellent, revealing that 72.3 % of students achieved high literacy levels (Good or Excellent), while 27.7 % remained in lower proficiency groups (Poor or Moderate). Key demographic findings highlight the role of gender and grade level in AI literacy development. Specifically, males had significantly higher odds of being in the “Excellent AI literacy” group compared to the “Poor AI literacy” group. Grade level also significantly predicted profile membership, with Year 10 and Year 11 students showing higher odds of achieving “Excellent AI literacy” compared to the “Poor AI literacy” group. These findings highlight the multi-faceted nature of AI literacy and its varied distribution among students. The validated ABCE framework and AILQ provide valuable tools for holistic assessment and curriculum design. The identified demographic influences underscore the need for differentiated and equity-focused instructional strategies to ensure all students are prepared for an AI-driven world.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Enhancing AI literacy course satisfaction through empowerment in AI problem-solving and ethical awareness: Development and validation of an AI project-based learning scale
  • The development and validation of the artificial intelligence literacy scale for middle school English teachers
  • Measuring Acceptance of Age-Tiered AI Literacy Guidebooks: A Developmentally Informed Study of K-12 Students and Teachers
  • Exploring the AI competencies of elementary school teachers in South Korea
  • The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education
  • Developing and validating measures for AI literacy tests: From self-reported to objective measures
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos