Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior

Dongpeng Huang
Nicole Hash
James J. Cummings
Kelsey Prena
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
8
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
estudio empírico
entrevistas
inteligencia artificial
integridad académica
educación superior
creencias y actitudes de los estudiantes
ética
ética de la IA
estudio empírico

Texto completo

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools become increasingly integrated into educational environments, concerns have emerged about their potential to facilitate academic dishonesty. Drawing on the modified theory of planned behavior, this study aimed to understand undergraduate students’ academic cheating behaviors using GenAI. The study conducted a mixed-method approach, utilizing focus groups and polls to gather insights from 25 undergraduate students enrolled in a course that incorporated GenAI into its pedagogical design in the United States. The results revealed that the integration of GenAI into higher education is perceived as inevitable. While students clearly recognized overt cheating, opinions varied regarding subtle forms of dishonesty and the effectiveness of formal deterrents. Peer influence and personal ethics were found to strongly shape cheating behaviors, with class policies enforced by instructors exerting a greater influence on student cheating behavior with GenAI than broader institutional policies. These insights can assist educators and policymakers in managing the challenges and opportunities presented by the integration of GenAI technologies into education.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Trajectories of AI policy in higher education: Interpretations, discourses, and enactments of students and teachers
  • Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage
  • A Q method study on Turkish EFL learners’ perspectives on the use of AI tools for writing: Benefits, concerns, and ethics
  • Artificial intelligence in the L2 classroom: Implications and challenges on ethics and equity in higher education: A 21st century Pandora's box
  • Diverging perceptions of artificial intelligence in higher education: A comparison of student and public assessments on risks and damages of academic performance prediction in Germany
  • Extending the technology acceptance model: The role of subjective norms, ethics, and trust in AI tool adoption among students
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos