Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Language learning strategies used by EFL students: Does their digital fluency matter?

Language learning strategies used by EFL students: Does their digital fluency matter?

Jia-Ying Lee
2026
Language Teaching Research
30-4
1890-1913
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
encuesta
estudio empírico
estrategias de aprendizaje
competencia digital
diferencias individuales
educación superior
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas

Major advances have been made in understanding language learning strategies (LLS). However, rapid changes in human interaction induced by the internet and web 2.0 warrant a re-assessment of LLS in today’s context, especially vis-à-vis digital nativeness. Therefore, a large-scale quantitative investigation involving 891 college students was conducted. Their LLS use patterns and frequency and their level of digital fluency were examined using two instruments: Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and Teo’s Digital Natives Assessment Scale (DNAS). The participants reported moderate usage of all the strategies described in SILL. However, they reported using specific SILL categories (compensation, memory, and metacognitive) more frequently than others (social, cognitive, and affective). Participants with different levels of digital fluency showed significant variations in the frequency of use of LLS. Additionally, compared to previous generations, these modern participants adopted different usage patterns.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Profiles of Chinese graduate students’ English writing self-efficacy: Associations with writing self-regulated learning strategies, writing performance, and demographic features
  • Understanding motivation, behaviors, and boredom in L2 learning: Variable-centered and person-centered approaches
  • Linking L2 mindsets, achievement emotions, and engagement to accomplishment: A PERMA+4 perspective on EFL well-being
  • Individual differences in self-regulated learning: Exploring the nexus of motivational beliefs, self-efficacy, and SRL strategies in EFL writing
  • Effect of student engagement on growth mindset in learning English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary: Role of foreign language enjoyment as mediator
  • Profiles of EFL Emotion Regulation Strategies and Associations With Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy and Burnout
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: [email protected]
Política de privacidad Créditos