Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The impact of glossing and reading activity manipulation on learning of L2 lexico-grammatical and lexical items

The impact of glossing and reading activity manipulation on learning of L2 lexico-grammatical and lexical items

Jookyoung Jung
2022
Language Teaching Research
26-4
777-798
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
estudio experimental
estudio empírico
adquisición de segundas lenguas
enseñanza/aprendizaje de vocabulario
comprensión lectora
input
vocabulario

The present study investigates the impact of glossing and reading activity manipulation on learning of target lexico-grammatical and lexical items. Eighty-eight Korean undergraduate students read either glossed or unglossed English texts. Each paragraph of the texts was split into two (less careful condition) or three to four subparts (more careful condition), and participants were asked to rearrange them into a coherent order and answer multiple-choice reading comprehension items. Glossing was conducted by providing Korean translations of target items, i.e. 15 English unaccusative verbs and 10 pseudowords. Learning was assessed with an untimed grammaticality judgment test and word form and meaning recognition tests. The results revealed that glossing affected word meaning recognition scores positively, but form recognition scores negatively. In addition, more careful reading facilitated learning of the target unaccusative verbs while having a negative influence on word meaning recognition scores. Neither glossing nor reading activity manipulation affected reading comprehension scores.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • The impact of textual enhancement and frequency manipulation on incidental learning of collocations from reading
  • Retention of new words learned incidentally from reading: Word exposure frequency, L1 marginal glosses, and their combination
  • How do first-language in-text repeated glosses in second-language reading influence novel words processing and learning outcomes beyond effects of occurrence frequency?
  • Reading and vocabulary acquisition: Supporting evidence and some objections
  • The impact of task guidance on incidental collocation learning from task-based reading
  • We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos