Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Maze tasks for L2 morphosyntactic skill acquisition

Maze tasks for L2 morphosyntactic skill acquisition

Jonathan Serfaty
2026
Language Teaching Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
estudio experimental
estudio empírico
adquisición de segundas lenguas
enseñanza/aprendizaje de la gramática
cognición y procesamiento
teorías de aprendizaje
educación primaria y secundaria
gramática

The maze task is an online activity in which participants continually select between two words to form grammatical sentences. This study investigated whether the maze task facilitates production and perception accuracy in English for Cambodian secondary-school learners. Participants ( N = 101) practiced target sentences in the maze task with either morphological or syntactic choices, whereas a control group practiced unrelated sentences. Learning within the task was assessed via error rates, response times, and the coefficient of variation across 10 rounds. Transfer was evaluated with time-pressured oral translation and grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs). Results showed evidence of proceduralization and automatization for the maze task itself, and all participants improved in both the oral tests and in perceiving morphological errors in the GJTs. However, there was no evidence that this improvement was due to the maze training, since the control group improved to the same extent as the other groups. Exploratory analyses suggested that the tests themselves resulted in learning, with the probability of morphological error perception increasing with each successive trial of the two GJTs. The findings highlight the skill specificity of procedural knowledge, as posited in skill acquisition theory, and the pedagogical potential for GJTs.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Aspectos cognitivos en el aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera
  • The effects of proactive form-focused instruction and individual differences on second language acquisition
  • Processing instruction with structured/unstructured output: Does it make any changes in automatic/non-automatic explicit grammar knowledge?
  • Effects of textual enhancement and task manipulation on L2 learners’ attentional processes and grammatical knowledge development: A mixed methods study
  • The associations between individual differences in language aptitude and working memory, and the effectiveness of input and output based instruction
  • The role of working memory in blocked and interleaved grammar practice: Proceduralization of L2 syntax
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: [email protected]
Política de privacidad Créditos