Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • ๐Ÿ“‹ Actividades
    • ๐Ÿ“ Conjugación
    • ๐Ÿ“Š Corpus
    • ๐Ÿ“” Diccionarios
    • โœ… Evaluación
    • โš™๏ธ Gramática
    • ๐Ÿ“— Manuales
    • โœ๏ธ Ortografía
    • ๐Ÿ“… Programación
    • ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Pronunciación
    • ๐Ÿ“ Recursos
    • ๐Ÿ”ค Vocabulario
    • ๐Ÿ’ป Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • ๐Ÿ“š Bibliografía
    • ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Congresos
    • ๐ŸŽ“ Cursos
    • ๐Ÿซ Centros
    • ๐Ÿข Organizaciones
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Revistas
    • ๐ŸŒ Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • ๐Ÿ’ผ Ofertas de trabajo
    • โ„น๏ธ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • ๐ŸŒ Sitios ELE
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Agregador
    • ๐Ÿ“ง Formespa
  • IA
    • โœจ Nuevos contenidos
    • ๐Ÿ“š Bibliografía IA
    • ๐Ÿงฐ Herramientas IA
    • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Prompts
    • ๐Ÿงช Experiencias IA
    • ๐ŸŒ Sitios web IA
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • ๐Ÿ“ฐ Actualidad ELE
    • ๐Ÿ˜Š Anécdotas ELE
    • ๐Ÿ“ Blog
    • ๐Ÿ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • GLAT: The generative AI literacy assessment test

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

GLAT: The generative AI literacy assessment test

Yueqiao Jin
Roberto Martinez-Maldonado
Dragan Gaševiฤ‡
Lixiang Yan
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
9
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
validación de instrumentos
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
alfabetización en IA
educación superior
evaluación
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

The rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technology into education requires precise measurement of GenAI literacy to ensure that learners and educators possess the skills to engage with and critically evaluate this transformative technology effectively. Existing instruments often rely on self-reports, which may be biased. In this study, we present the GenAI Literacy Assessment Test (GLAT), a 20-item multiple-choice instrument developed following established procedures in psychological and educational measurement. Structural validity and reliability were confirmed with responses from 355 higher education students using classical test theory and item response theory, resulting in a reliable 2-parameter logistic (2PL) model (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80; omega total = 0.81) with a robust factor structure (RMSEA = 0.03; CFI = 0.97). Critically, GLAT scores were found to be significant predictors of learners' performance in GenAI-supported tasks, outperforming self-reported measures such as perceived ChatGPT proficiency and demonstrating external validity. These results suggest that GLAT offers a reliable and valid method for assessing GenAI literacy, with the potential to inform educational practices and policy decisions that aim to enhance learners' and educators' GenAI literacy, ultimately equipping them to navigate an AI-enhanced future.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • What do university students know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test
  • Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI
  • Developing and validating measures for AI literacy tests: From self-reported to objective measures
  • The agency gap in AI-supported writing: How reactive and proactive agent designs shape multimodal reasoning
  • Objective measurement of AI literacy: Development and validation of the AI competency objective scale (AICOS)
  • Developing and validating an artificial intelligence ethical awareness scale for secondary and university students: Cultivating ethical awareness through problem-solving with artificial intelligence tools
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: [email protected]
Política de privacidad Créditos