Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The development of policies on generative artificial intelligence in UK universities

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

The development of policies on generative artificial intelligence in UK universities

Thomas D. Wilson
2025
IFLA Journal
51-3
722-734
https://doi.org/10.1177/034003522513337…
artículo
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
educación superior
integridad académica
evaluación
IA y educación
guía

Texto completo

Generative AI has seen rapid development and adoption in educational settings, presenting both benefits and challenges for universities. This paper examines the response of UK universities, particularly the Russell Group of research-led universities, in developing policies and guidance on the use of generative AI. The analysis covers the implementation of the Russell Group's principles across member institutions, addressing areas such as academic integrity, assessment practices, student use, and guidance for staff. It also explores the varying levels of policy development at non-Russell Group universities, finding that some institutions may struggle to find resources for this issue. The paper situates these institutional responses within theoretical frameworks, highlighting how generative AI has disrupted established practices in higher education. It concludes by emphasizing the need for ongoing collaboration, policy development, and responsiveness to student perspectives as universities navigate this technology.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Russell Group principles on the use of generative AI tools in education
  • Generative AI in higher education teaching & learning: Policy framework
  • Report of MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, and Research Training
  • Referencial para Desenvolvimento e Uso Responsáveis de Inteligência Artificial na Educação
  • The opposite of cheating: Teaching for integrity in the age of AI
  • Generative AI in higher education teaching & learning: Principles for ethical AI adoption
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos