Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Affective computing in online higher education: A systematic literature review

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Affective computing in online higher education: A systematic literature review

Krist Shingjergji
Deniz Iren
Corrie Urlings
Roland Klemke
2026
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
10
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
revisión bibliográfica
inteligencia artificial
factores afectivos
enseñanza en línea e híbrida
educación superior
ética
IA y educación
revisión de bibliografía

Texto completo

Although affective states play a crucial role in education, they are often difficult to communicate and observe in online learning environments. This challenge has led to growing research on systems that can automatically detect affective states. This systematic literature review used PRISMA to analyze 96 studies on affective computing in online higher education, published between 2019 and 2024. The findings show that the most frequently studied affective states include learning-centered states, such as engagement, confusion, frustration, sentiment, as well as basic emotions, such as happiness, anger, sadness, surprise, and fear. Terminology often overlaps, and basic emotions are commonly used as proxies for learning-centered states. The most used modality is facial expression, with the dominant detection approach being deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks. Most studies rely on self-collected datasets that, due to privacy concerns, are not publicly shared, limiting reproducibility and generalizability. FER2013, collected in a generic context, and DAiSEE, collected in an online educational setting, are the most used public datasets. A key limitation is that most systems are not evaluated in real classrooms, revealing a gap between technological development, and educational application. Ethical considerations are often overlooked, with privacy, when addressed, being the main focus. Finally, the review’s findings highlight the need for stronger integration between education and technology through interdisciplinary collaboration and real-world validation.

Highlights:

  • Engagement, confusion, frustration, sentiment, and basic emotions are often studied.
  • The main modality and detection method are facial expressions and deep learning (CNN).
  • Most systems are not evaluated in classrooms, revealing a technology-education gap.
  • Ethical considerations are often overlooked, privacy is the main focus when addressed.
  • The results reveal a need for stronger integration between education and technology.
Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning
  • Transforming education with AI: A systematic review of ChatGPT’s role in learning, academic practices, and institutional adoption
  • Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review
  • New systems of learning for distance learning institutions? A six-study review of implementing AIDA
  • What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature
  • The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: a systematic review
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos