Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • AI-mediated research agency formation in higher education: Autonomy, self-efficacy and innovation in early-career scientific training

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

AI-mediated research agency formation in higher education: Autonomy, self-efficacy and innovation in early-career scientific training

Shanshan Han
Pingqing Liu
2026
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
11
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
encuesta
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
educación superior
aprendizaje autónomo
metodología de investigación
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

Generative AI is becoming part of the infrastructure of higher education research training, yet little is known about how AI-mediated environments shape early-career researchers’ agency. This study examines AI dependence, defined as reliance on intelligent tools as a primary source of cognitive support in judgement-intensive research tasks, and interprets its educational risk as epistemic delegation: the transfer of problem framing, methodological choice and interpretive authority from the researcher to the intelligent system. Drawing on an AI-mediated research agency formation framework, we examined whether research autonomy and research self-efficacy mediate the association between AI dependence and innovative research behaviour, and whether supervisory support moderates these pathways. An anonymous questionnaire was circulated through peer-based WeChat groups among astronomy doctoral students and postdoctoral researchers in China. After pre-specified data-quality screening, 420 valid responses were retained. Split-sample factor analyses supported a broad one-factor AI-dependence scale, and item-level confirmatory factor analysis supported the five-factor measurement model. AI dependence was negatively associated with research autonomy and research self-efficacy, both of which were positively associated with innovative research behaviour. The indirect association through research autonomy was stronger than that through research self-efficacy. Supervisory support was positively associated with autonomy, self-efficacy and innovation, and weakened the negative associations between AI dependence and research autonomy and innovative behaviour; the interaction predicting self-efficacy was directionally consistent but did not reach statistical significance. The findings shift the debate from AI-enabled productivity to AI-mediated researcher formation and position supervisory support as a relational foundation for epistemic supervision through explanation, verification and reflective AI use.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Comparing Generative AI and teacher feedback: Student perceptions of usefulness and trustworthiness
  • The AI challenge: How college faculty assess the present and future of higher education in the age of AI
  • College faculty perceptions of generative artificial intelligence in higher education
  • The use of the Gen AI tool Brisk Teaching in the educational process and its impact on student motivation
  • Criteria related to the pedagogical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in university teaching
  • Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos