Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • πŸ“š Bibliografía
  • Debate as a pedagogical tool for developing speaking skills in second language education

Debate as a pedagogical tool for developing speaking skills in second language education

Abid el Majidi
Rick de Graaff
Daniel Janssen
2024
Language Teaching Research
28-6
2431-2452
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/1…
artículo
estudio experimental
estudio empírico
expresión oral
educación primaria y secundaria
enfoques y métodos
interacción
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas

Many secondary school students' second language (L2) speaking skills suffer from deficiencies; the effects thereof are detrimental to their academic and career opportunities in a globalized world that highlights the importance of oral communication skills. Debate has been considered a potentially effective speaking pedagogical tool that can scaffold learning processes in ways that can lead to language development. This study investigates the effect of a debate intervention on English L2 speaking competence of Dutch secondary school students. Following a pretest–posttest control group design, we elicited speech samples from opinion tasks which we coded in terms of measures of speech quantity, fluency, complexity, accuracy and cohesion. Multilevel analysis results indicate that after the intervention, the intervention group produced more language which was more fluent, accurate, coherent and lexically more sophisticated relative to the control group. These findings, which have significant implications for L2 speaking development, are discussed in relation to specific characteristics of L2 debate pedagogy.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Debate pedagogy as a conducive environment for L2 argumentative essay writing
  • EFL students’ self-directed learning of conversation skills with AI chatbots
  • Los diálogos en clase
  • Discurso y metodología de enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras
  • Principios didácticos para la enseñanza de la pronunciación en lenguas extranjeras
  • Coteaching in K-12 second/foreign language classrooms: A systematic review from 1998 to 2024
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos