Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Fixing teachers’ problems? Exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Fixing teachers’ problems? Exploring teachers’ repair and maintenance work around generative AI technologies

Marita Ljungqvist
Anders Sonesson
Neil Selwyn
2026
Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
1-12
https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2026.2…
artículo
estudio empírico
entrevistas
inteligencia artificial
práctica docente
tecnología educativa
formación de profesores
ética
IA y educación
ética de la IA
estudio empírico

Texto completo

The promise that AI tools will relieve teachers of tedious tasks and liberate time for more «valuable» work with students has become a dominant narrative. However, the implementation of automated technologies raises questions around how human labour is implicated and situated in these processes. From the perspective of maintenance and repair studies we approach the often-hidden labour that teachers undertake when engaging with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies. Drawing on interviews with Swedish teachers we expose the tools' inherent limitations in teaching contexts, and highlight the pedagogical, social, and moral dimensions of educational practice. We argue that these essentially inexplicable and ungeneralizable aspects of teaching — grounded in teachers' situated awareness, professional experience, and tacit knowledge — cannot be codified or reduced to training data. Our results demonstrate the need for a radical rethinking of the forms of AI that education could benefit from — and those it should resist.

Publicación en línea anticipada (abril de 2026), aún sin volumen ni número asignados. Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Preparing pre-service teachers for responsible generative AI use: Curriculum implications for ethics, privacy, and AI literacy
  • Criteria related to the pedagogical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in university teaching
  • Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education
  • How to responsibly deploy a predictive modelling dashboard for study advisors? A use case illustrating various stakeholder perspectives
  • Value-sensitive design in action: Designing student-centered intelligent tutoring systems with community college students and instructors
  • La vida online, la inteligencia artificial y su lectura pedagógica
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos