Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Machine learning for spelling acquisition: How accurate is the prediction of specific spelling errors in German primary school students?

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Machine learning for spelling acquisition: How accurate is the prediction of specific spelling errors in German primary school students?

Richard Boehme
Stefan Coors
Patrick Oster
Meike Munser-Kiefer
Sven Hilbert
2024
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
6
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
ortografía
alfabetización
educación primaria y secundaria
IA y enseñanza-aprendizaje de lenguas
estudio empírico

Texto completo

In Germany (similar to other countries), 30 % of students demonstrate insufficient spelling skills at the end of primary school – partly owing to the challenge for teachers to manage a variety of students' learning needs. Digital tools using Machine Learning can enable teachers to individualise students' learning. However, there are still no suitable approaches for demographics of students who are not yet proficient in spelling.With an aim to adapt Machine Learning for students of all proficiencies, we investigate how accurately specific spelling errors can be predicted across different skill levels, and what the content-related reasons for incorrect predictions are.To that end, we developed a web application to record the spelling efforts of N = 685 first- and second-graders in Bavaria, Germany. A total of 18,133 different misspellings were recorded. Using this dataset, we trained six Machine Learning models and compared their performances to predict misspellings.Comparing all Machine Learning models employed in this work, the Random Forest performed best on average as a predictor of spelling errors. Errors at the syllable- and morpheme-levels were predicted best, and errors at the basic phoneme-grapheme-level were predicted slightly less accurately. Confusions often concerned cases that are considered linguistically ambiguous or occurred in complex error entanglements. The implications of these results are discussed.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • A computational investigation of inventive spelling and the “Lesen durch Schreiben” method
  • Automatic proficiency scoring for early-stage writing
  • Improving reading and comprehension in K-12: Evidence from a large-scale AI technology intervention in India
  • Assessing reading fluency in elementary grades: A machine learning approach
  • EFL students’ self-directed learning of conversation skills with AI chatbots
  • Teachers’ attitudes towards AI integration in foreign language learning: Supporting differentiated instruction and flipped classroom
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos