Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The effects of machine translation (MT) use on the writing quality and perceptions of L2 writers across proficiency levels: A longitudinal examination

The effects of machine translation (MT) use on the writing quality and perceptions of L2 writers across proficiency levels: A longitudinal examination

Dae-Min Kang
2026
Language Teaching Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
estudio longitudinal
encuesta
estudio empírico
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas
traducción automática
expresión escrita
creencias y actitudes de los estudiantes
tecnología educativa
traducción

This study investigated the influence of using machine translation (MT) for second language (L2) writing on the subsequent L2 writing produced without the use of MT. A total of 130 Korean university learners of L2 English at three proficiency levels generated English essays without utilizing MT during the first and last classes of a general English course. Between these two occasions of writing, they wrote in English employing MT on four occasions. The first and final essays were compared via syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF) measures. The learners were also asked about their attitudes toward and use of MT. The results indicated that MT use affected L2 writing differently according to proficiency levels. The advanced learners and the low-intermediate learners, who represented the lowest-level learners in this study, improved more in terms of lexical complexity and syntactic complexity, respectively. The high-intermediate learners benefited less than those in the other two proficiency groups. Regarding accuracy and fluency, the learners across the proficiency levels produced higher quality writing. Concerning their attitudes toward MT, the lower their proficiency levels were, the more positive their attitudes were.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools
  • Thirty years of machine translation in language teaching and learning: A review of the literature
  • Todo tiene un precio: ¿la tecnología mejora las habilidades escritas de los estudiantes?
  • When disruptive innovations drive educational transformation: Literacy, pocket calculator, Google Translate, ChatGPT
  • Effects of Google translate on lexical diversity: vocabulary development among learners of Spanish as a foreign language
  • Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos