Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Bridging the research–pedagogy gap: ESL teachers’ beliefs about L2 fluency and fluency-enhancing classroom practices

Bridging the research–pedagogy gap: ESL teachers’ beliefs about L2 fluency and fluency-enhancing classroom practices

Ayano Kawasaki
2026
Language Teaching Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
encuesta
entrevistas
observación de aula
estudio empírico
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas
creencias y actitudes de los profesores
expresión oral
práctica docente
formación de profesores

Despite substantial development in second-language (L2) fluency research, fluency remains underexplored in L2 teaching. Emerging evidence suggests that research-based fluency-enhancing activities are not fully utilized in classrooms, partly due to teachers’ relatively broad conceptualization of fluency. To address this issue, this study examines (1) teachers’ beliefs about fluency and fluency-enhancing activities and (2) the extent to which these beliefs are reflected in their classroom practices. By triangulating data from questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations, this study contributes to the growing body of L2 fluency research, which has primarily focused on teachers’ self-reported data, thereby paving the way toward bridging the research–pedagogy gap. Using a mixed-methods approach, the analysis revealed (1) a discrepancy between teachers’ self-reported understanding and evidence-based conceptualization of fluency, (2) a tendency to equate fluency with general speaking skills rather than fluency-specific features, and (3) considerable variation in the quality of fluency-enhancing activities implemented by teachers. These findings highlight the need for teacher training that promotes a more refined understanding of fluency and the effective implementation of fluency-focused activities.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Making fluency research accessible to second language teachers: The impact of a training intervention
  • Examining the perceptions and self-reported practices of L2 teachers in China regarding oral fluency: A conceptual replication and extension
  • Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices
  • From task-based training to task-based instruction: Novice language teachers’ experiences and perspectives
  • Factors affecting novice and experienced teachers’ implementation of task-based language teaching under a framework of fidelity of implementation
  • From theory to practice: Understanding the long-term impact of an L2 writing education course on writing teachers
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos