Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • AI advocates and cautious critics: How AI attitudes, AI interest, use of AI, and AI literacy build university students' AI self-efficacy

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

AI advocates and cautious critics: How AI attitudes, AI interest, use of AI, and AI literacy build university students' AI self-efficacy

Arne Bewersdorff
Marie Hornberger
Claudia Nerdel
Daniel S. Schiff
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
8
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
encuesta
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
alfabetización en IA
educación superior
creencias y actitudes de los estudiantes
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

This study investigates how cognitive, affective, and behavioral variables related to artificial intelligence (AI) build AI self-efficacy among university students. Based on these variables, we identify three meaningful student groups, which can guide educational initiatives. We recruited 1465 undergraduate and graduate students from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany and measured their AI self-efficacy, AI literacy, interest in AI, attitudes towards AI, and AI use. Using a path model, we examine the correlations and paths among these variables. Results reveal that AI usage and positive AI attitudes significantly predict interest in AI, which in turn and together with AI literacy, enhance AI self-efficacy. Moreover, using Gaussian Mixture Models, we identify three groups of students: 'AI Advocates,' 'Cautious Critics,' and 'Pragmatic Observers,' each exhibiting unique patterns of AI-related cognitive, affective, and behavioral traits. Our findings demonstrate the necessity of educational strategies that not only focus on AI literacy but also aim to foster students' AI attitudes, usage, and interest to effectively promote AI self-efficacy. Furthermore, we argue that educators who aim to design inclusive AI educational programs should take into account the distinct needs of different student groups identified in this study.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • What undergraduate students need to know and actually know about generative AI
  • Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI
  • What do university students know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test
  • Exploring the relationships among perceived AI ability, academic self-efficacy and independent learning disposition in the tertiary contexts
  • Enhancing AI literacy course satisfaction through empowerment in AI problem-solving and ethical awareness: Development and validation of an AI project-based learning scale
  • Human-AI collaboration in higher education: Exploring the impact of technology expectations and distrust
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos