Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • An exploration of the role of generative AI in fostering creativity in architectural learning environments

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

An exploration of the role of generative AI in fostering creativity in architectural learning environments

Carlos Medel-Vera
Sandy Britton
William Francis Gates
2025
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
9
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
estudio empírico
inteligencia artificial
educación superior
creencias y actitudes de los estudiantes
prompts
IA y educación
estudio empírico

Texto completo

This paper explores the role of generative AI (GenAI) in supporting creativity within architectural education through the lens of a student-led AI drawing competition. The research addresses two questions: (1) how creative are students' text prompts and the resulting AI-generated images, and is there a relationship between them? and (2) to what extent do students perceive GenAI as a supportive tool in their creative process? Drawing on a mixed-methods approach, the study combines semantic analysis of text prompts, aesthetic evaluation of AI-generated images, and a Creativity Support Index (CSI) survey, complemented by sentiment analysis of student feedback. The semantic analysis reveals varying levels of conceptual richness across prompts, with higher divergence correlating to more open-ended and expressive image results. The CSI data indicates strong support for exploratory and goal-directed creativity, with high scores in exploration and results-worth-effort dimensions. These findings suggest that GenAI can function as both a collaborator and provocateur in design pedagogy, facilitating creative ideation while inviting new pedagogical strategies centred on prompt literacy and reflective design. The study concludes by discussing implications for integrating AI tools into design education, emphasising the pedagogical value of prompt literacy, and calling for further research on creative agency and authorship in hybrid human–AI workflows.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • AI advocates and cautious critics: How AI attitudes, AI interest, use of AI, and AI literacy build university students' AI self-efficacy
  • Strengthening students’ research efficacy in higher institutions. A joint mediating effect of the impact of Artificial intelligence using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM)
  • What undergraduate students need to know and actually know about generative AI
  • Trajectories of AI policy in higher education: Interpretations, discourses, and enactments of students and teachers
  • Students’ multimodal prompting practices as epistemic work in AI literacy development
  • Beyond tool use: Tracking the evolution of generative AI literacy among university students through a process-oriented investigation
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos