Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Learner spoken output and teacher response in second versus foreign language classrooms

Learner spoken output and teacher response in second versus foreign language classrooms

Eva Thue Vold
2025
Language Teaching Research
29-2
751-785
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
observación de aula
estudio empírico
interacción
feedback/retroalimentación
expresión oral
práctica docente
educación primaria y secundaria
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas

Texto completo

It is commonly agreed that learner target language output and spoken interaction are essential to communicative language learning. This video-based classroom observation study of five lower secondary schools in Norway investigated how second language (L2) English and third language (L3) French teachers responded to their students when they spoke the target language in class. Using categories and functions from classroom interaction research and corrective feedback research, L2 English and L3 French teachers’ response patterns to learner target language output were identified and compared. Findings indicated that L2 English teachers taught in a meaning- and fluency-oriented context, frequently ignoring errors and providing ample content-related responses, while L3 French teachers taught in a form-and-accuracy context, using varied strategies to correct errors and rarely engaging with the content of the learners’ utterances. The article discusses some consequences of this lack of context shifts within subjects and recommends an increased focus on contextual differences to facilitate mutual transfer of successful practices between contexts.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Corrective feedback and learner uptake: negotiation of form in communicative classrooms
  • Multimodality in third turn repetitions: Evaluation, mitigation, and the pursuit of responses in a Korean-as-foreign-language classroom
  • Debate as a pedagogical tool for developing speaking skills in second language education
  • The mediating role of willingness to communicate: Linking dialogic teaching to student discursive engagement in L2 classrooms
  • Learner proficiency and EFL learning through task rehearsal and performance
  • Actividades comunicativas para promover el uso de una lengua extranjera: el juego como punto de partida
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos