Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The role of modality and working memory capacity in L2 production

The role of modality and working memory capacity in L2 production

Myeongeun Son
2025
Language Teaching Research
29-7
2986-3006
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10…
artículo
estudio empírico
expresión oral
expresión escrita
cognición y procesamiento
diferencias individuales
adquisición de segundas lenguas

This study investigates whether linguistic outcomes of second language (L2) learners' performance are consistent across oral and written modalities and, if so, whether the consistency remains across proficiency levels. The study also explores whether the linguistic outcomes of speaking, writing, or both are related to working memory capacity. Eighty-six L2 learners, from beginner to advanced, described a series of pictures within time constraints in speech and in writing, and completed two working memory tests. The study found greater syntactic complexity and lexical sophistication in the written than in the oral modality. However, the oral task elicited more lexical diversity, and the advanced learners produced more subordinate clauses in the oral task than in the written task. Learners with more working memory capacity produced marginally more complex structures in the oral task than learners with less working memory capacity. These findings have implications for the effective implementation of speaking and writing activities in L2 learning.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • The Role of Working Memory, Emotional Intelligence, and Task Type in L2 Writing
  • Working memory, L2 proficiency, and L2 speech performance across different task types
  • How do attention-shift and foreign language anxiety interact with objective and subjective measures of fluency?
  • Effects of Working Memory and Topic Familiarity on EFL Learners’ Oral Production
  • The contribution of written corrective feedback and its association with working memory on the development of EFL learners’ English plurals
  • Investigating the contribution of L1 fluency, L2 initial fluency, working memory and phonological memory to L2 fluency development
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: [email protected]
Política de privacidad Créditos