Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • 📋 Actividades
    • 📝 Conjugación
    • 📊 Corpus
    • 📔 Diccionarios
    • ✅ Evaluación
    • ⚙️ Gramática
    • 📗 Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • 📅 Programación
    • 🗣️ Pronunciación
    • 📁 Recursos
    • 🔤 Vocabulario
    • 💻 Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • 📚 Bibliografía
    • 👥 Congresos
    • 🎓 Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏢 Organizaciones
    • 📰 Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • 💼 Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • 📰 Agregador
    • 📧 Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • 📚 Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • 💬 Prompts
    • 🧪 Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • 📰 Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • 📰 Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • 📝 Blog
    • 📌Tablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Pluralism Behind Boredom Coping in Language Learning: Evidence From a Q Methodology Study

Pluralism Behind Boredom Coping in Language Learning: Evidence From a Q Methodology Study

Mehdi Solhi
Athip Thumvichit
Mirosław Pawlak
Mariusz Kruk
2026
Language Teaching Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
estudio empírico
factores afectivos
estrategias de aprendizaje
diferencias individuales
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas

The present study investigated how second or foreign language (L2) learners cope with boredom in class, using Q methodology. The participants were 40 undergraduate English majors (12 male, 28 female). By-person factor analysis identified three coping profiles, namely, acceptors , escapers , and strivers . The acceptors viewed coping as a personal responsibility and acknowledged boredom as a natural and temporary emotion. These learners reminded themselves of the value of the lesson, reflected on the causes of boredom, and planned to prepare for future situations, showing a reflective and mindful attitude. The escapers tackled boredom through mental or behavioral disengagement. They tended to distract themselves or share their feelings with peers. While they avoided confronting boredom directly, they neither blamed themselves nor the teacher. The strivers demonstrated persistence and discipline. They coped boredom by staying task-focused, taking notes, highlighting key points, and consciously redirecting attention to maintain engagement. For them, boredom was a signal to work harder and remain committed to learning goals rather than a reason to disengage. Taken together, learners may adopt different reflective, avoidant, or effortful responses to boredom experiences across L2 learning contexts. This study offers both theoretical and practical implications for understanding learner boredom and diverse coping patterns in L2 classrooms.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Profiles of EFL Emotion Regulation Strategies and Associations With Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy and Burnout
  • Profiles of Chinese graduate students’ English writing self-efficacy: Associations with writing self-regulated learning strategies, writing performance, and demographic features
  • Can grit be perceived and regulated? A mixed-methods exploration of English learners’ metacognitive awareness of grit and its impact on achievement and self-efficacy
  • Development and Validation of the Second or Foreign Language Boredom Coping Strategies Scale
  • Motivation and self-regulated strategy use: Relationships to primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong
  • Individual differences in self-regulated learning: Exploring the nexus of motivational beliefs, self-efficacy, and SRL strategies in EFL writing
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos