Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Learning with machines: Toward a theory of epistemic co-agency

Sección IA: Inteligencia artificial Bibliografía

Learning with machines: Toward a theory of epistemic co-agency

Anita Samuel
2026
Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence
10
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a…
artículo
trabajo teórico
inteligencia artificial
teorías de aprendizaje
cognición y procesamiento
IA y educación

Texto completo

The rapid integration of generative AI (GenAI) systems into educational settings necessitates a reevaluation of how learners reason, construct, and assume responsibility for knowledge. Existing learning theories like constructivism, sociocultural theory, and connectivism presume human-centered epistemic agency and fail to account for the ways GenAI simulates reasoning, reframes arguments, and co-constructs meaning. This paper introduces the Epistemic Entanglement Framework, a theory-informed model that captures how learners engage with AI systems. Drawing on distributed cognition, sociomaterialism, and posthumanist theory, the framework proposes epistemic co-agency as a reflexive stance wherein learners engage AI outputs dialectically—challenging assumptions, surfacing contradictions, and asserting epistemic sovereignty. Instructional and assessment implications are discussed, emphasizing the need to design for epistemic transformation, not just task efficiency. Ultimately, this work argues that the central challenge of AI in education is not technological fluency, but the cultivation of learners who can reason with, through, and against generative systems. As AI becomes a durable presence in learning, education must focus not only on what students know, but on how they engage with GenAI systems to create knowledge.

Texto completo en abierto (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures
  • Reconceptualizing community of inquiry in the age of generative artificial intelligence
  • Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms
  • Human and artificial cognition
  • Transitions through lifelong learning: Implications for learning analytics
  • Rethinking the entwinement between artificial intelligence and human learning: What capabilities do learners need for a world with AI?
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos