Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • Exploring L2 postgraduate students’ engagement with supervisor feedback in academic writing

Exploring L2 postgraduate students’ engagement with supervisor feedback in academic writing

Xiaolong Cheng
Lawrence Jun Zhang
Timothy JE Neufeld
2025
Language Teaching Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
encuesta
entrevistas
estudio empírico
feedback/retroalimentación
escritura académica
expresión escrita
educación superior
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas

While studies on student engagement with teacher feedback have proliferated, these investigations have mainly focused on undergraduate students in non-academic writing contexts with limited participants. Consequently, little is known about how second language (L2) postgraduate students engaged with their supervisors’ feedback in academic writing. To fill this important gap, we employed a mixed-methods approach to examine how L2 postgraduates engaged with supervisor feedback affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively in academic writing. In our study, we collected data from multiple sources including questionnaires, students’ first and revised writing samples, supervisors’ feedback, semi-structured interviews, and stimulated recalls. The analyses of quantitative and qualitative data showed that the participants generally engaged with their supervisors’ feedback and related activities actively and profoundly in affective, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. We conclude our study with a discussion on the important pedagogical implications these findings can offer.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • ‘All my effort in writing the first draft was wasted!’: Engagement with supervisory feedback on undergraduate theses
  • EFL undergraduate thesis supervision: Exploring supervisors’ written feedback beliefs and practices
  • Contextualized guided interventions to enhance EFL undergraduates’ writing self-efficacy: Insights from the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale
  • Learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback during written telecollaboration
  • Exploring the potential of GenAI for personalised English teaching: Learners' experiences and perceptions
  • How language proficiency and peer familiarity shape engagement with feedback in English as a Foreign Language writing
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos