Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • IA
    • ✨ Nuevos contenidos
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía IA
    • 🧰 Herramientas IA
    • πŸ’¬ Prompts
    • πŸ§ͺ Experiencias IA
    • 🌐 Sitios web IA
    • πŸ“° Actualidad IA
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • Bibliografia
  • The impact of multimodal composing on CSL learners’ writing performance: Considering language, structure, and content dimensions

The impact of multimodal composing on CSL learners’ writing performance: Considering language, structure, and content dimensions

Yufang Pan
Li Lei
2025
Language Teaching Research
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.117…
artículo
estudio experimental
entrevistas
estudio empírico
multimodalidad
expresión escrita
motivación
enseñanza/aprendizaje de lenguas
factores afectivos

Despite the increasing prevalence of multimodal approaches and multimodal composing (MC) in Chinese as a second language (CSL) instruction, whether MC can positively impact the writing performance of CSL learners remains to be further explored. This study focuses on advanced-level CSL learners and investigates the impact of MC on their writing performance through a quasi-experimental study involving three writing tasks. Learners’ attitudes and evaluations towards MC are examined via a reflection survey and a semi-structured interview, and their writing performance is evaluated using three criteria, namely language, structure, and content. The results indicated that the experimental group engaged in MC demonstrated greater syntactic complexity, structure, and content compared to the control group. However, while the experimental group showed a decline in accuracy and increased lexical diversity, there was no significant difference compared to the control group. Overall, the experimental group expressed a positive attitude towards MC, which enhanced their motivation. This study offers new perspectives and methodologies for investigating MC performance. The findings provide valuable insights for both research and practice in integrating MC into CSL writing instruction.

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • Generative AI in EFL writing instruction for lower-intermediate learners: Do perceived affective gains translate to improved performance?
  • Artificial intelligence-enhanced self-paced learning in English as a foreign language: A nonlinear dynamic and self-determination framework for optimizing postgraduate linguistic proficiency—a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial
  • Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation
  • Why only feedback? Including feed up and feed forward improves non-linguistic aspects of L2 writing
  • Motivational languaging intervention for L2 learners: The differential effect of individual and group writing
  • “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos