Assessments in L2 conversation-for-learning discussions

Using multimodal conversation analysis, this study examines how assessments function as interactional resources for managing second language (L2) discussion topics in conversation for learning (CFL) contexts. Drawing on nine hours of video-recorded discussions, we analyse how students initiate and expand topics through assessments directed at either the primary speaker or third parties. Our guiding research question is: How do first-position assessments in CFL discussions shape participation, topic progression, and the management of interactional contingencies? The analysis reveals that assessments directed at the primary speaker, whether positive or negative, prompt elaboration or justification, leading to extended participation. In contrast, assessments of third parties produce different interactional outcomes: positive assessments foster shared alignment without necessitating further elaboration, while negative assessments invoke moral accountability, prompting participants to justify or defend the assessed third party. Overall, this analysis highlights students’ collaborative efforts in managing assessments to create opportunities to practice L2. Furthermore, the assessment trajectories reflect the participants’ concern with managing social relationships. This study advances research on assessment-in-interaction and CFL while providing valuable insights for designing L2 speaking tasks that foster more dynamic and participatory discussions.