Inicio
todoELE
  • Inicio
  • Materiales
    • πŸ“‹ Actividades
    • πŸ“ Conjugación
    • πŸ“Š Corpus
    • πŸ“” Diccionarios
    • βœ… Evaluación
    • βš™οΈ Gramática
    • πŸ“— Manuales
    • ✍️ Ortografía
    • πŸ“… Programación
    • πŸ—£οΈ Pronunciación
    • πŸ“ Recursos
    • πŸ”€ Vocabulario
  • Formación
    • πŸ“š Bibliografía
    • πŸ‘₯ Congresos
    • πŸŽ“ Cursos
    • 🏫 Centros
    • 🏒 Organizaciones
    • πŸ“° Revistas
    • 🌍 Atlas de ELE
  • Trabajo
    • πŸ’Ό Ofertas de trabajo
    • ℹ️ Trabajo - Recursos
  • En la red
    • 🌐 Sitios ELE
    • πŸ“° Agregador
    • πŸ“§ Formespa
  • Tecnología
    • πŸ’» Herramientas digitales
  • Comunidad
    • πŸ“° Actualidad ELE
    • 😊 Anécdotas ELE
    • πŸ“ Blog
    • πŸ“ŒTablón de anuncios
  • Buscar

Ruta de navegación

  • Inicio
  • πŸ“š Bibliografía
  • How effective is second language incidental vocabulary learning? A meta-analysis

How effective is second language incidental vocabulary learning? A meta-analysis

Stuart Webb
Takumi Uchihara
Akifumi Yanagisawa
2023
Language Teaching
56-2
161-180
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals…
artículo
metaanálisis
revisión bibliográfica
enseñanza/aprendizaje de vocabulario
vocabulario
input

Texto completo

There is a great deal of variation in gains found between studies of second language (L2) incidental vocabulary learning, as well as many factors that affect learning. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of exposure to L2 meaning-focused input on incidental vocabulary learning with an aim to clarify the proportional gains that occur through meaning-focused learning. Twenty-four primary studies were retrieved providing 29 different effect sizes and a total sample size of 2,771 participants (1,517 in experimental groups vs. 1,254 in control groups). Results showed large overall effects for incidental vocabulary learning on first and follow-up posttests. Mean proportions of target words learned ranged from 9–18% on immediate posttests, and 6–17% on delayed posttests. Incidental L2 vocabulary learning gains were similar across reading (17%, 15%), listening (15%, 13%), and reading while listening (13%, 17%) conditions on immediate and delayed posttest. In contrast, the proportion of words learned in viewing conditions on immediate posttests was smaller (7%, 5%). Findings also revealed that the amount of incidental learning varies according to a range of moderator variables including learner characteristics (L2 proficiency, institutional levels), materials (text type and audience), learning activities (spacing, mode of input), and methodological features (approaches to controlling prior word knowledge).

  • Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios

Enviar publicación

Contenidos relacionados

  • El método IBI en la enseñanza del léxico: teoría, investigación y nuevas perspectivas
  • Developing automaticity and speed of lexical access: the effects of incidental and explicit teaching approaches
  • The effects of word frequency and typographical enhancement on incidental vocabulary learning in reading
  • El método IBI en la enseñanza de ELE. Aplicación de la gamificación en el Camino de Santiago
  • Exploring repeated captioning viewing as a way to promote vocabulary learning: time lag between repetitions and learner factors
  • L2 Vocabulary learning from reading: Effects of word-focused activity type, learner variables, and announcement
Sobre Todoele Índice Publica Contacto: todoele@gmail.com
Política de privacidad Créditos